Task 3b . Theories relating to network.
The first theory I had a closer look at was that of affiliation. The need we have to create a support network
around us. Of course, I thought about my
affiliations both professionally and personally. My closest, most static affiliation is, like
others, my family and a few close friends.
Thinking about my experience in college and school there were people I
swore to always stay in touch with, but as my needs and the needs of those
people changed it’s safe to say we drifted.
Some affiliations will last a lifetime, because they are
unchanging relationships, family or people you consider as family. The rest will change, often
dramatically. I was reading the chapter
given on our reading list for affiliation when I came across a term I didn’t
understand and wasn’t familiar with, ‘ individualistic culture’ so I had
conducted an Internet search to find out what exactly this meant. From my further reading I understand the phrase
to be describing a culture, which is very focused on the ideas of self worth
and independence. The opposing theory to this is the idea of collectivist
cultures where there is a more community and collected feel, people are more
likely to act in a way that benefits and entire group of people.
From the given
article and other websites I began to see myself and my experiences being
categorized. As a child I was always
invited to everyone’s birthday party… I was in everybody’s friendship group but
I wouldn’t say that I had any “best friends”. Clearly at that age, I didn’t
feel the need to affiliate myself with anyone in particular. A similar pattern has continued throughout my
personal and professional life, there are only a few people who I consider true
friends. I see myself as a very private
person; I value the feeling of privacy. So in theory I am acting with characteristic
tendencies valued in an individualistic culture; in the sense that I have had
many friendships over the years but few long lasting and deep. So, how much influence does our culture have
on our networking, our professional practice?
It seems to me to be quite a strong connection; It seems like we connect
with people and move through our professional life in a very individualistic
way. This is a very strong concept in
the performing arts, it is a very individualistic professional world as shows
and jobs don’t often last very long then you are moving on and looking for the
next one again.
I think it is
important to note that there is always a strong sense of competition in the
arts and sharing information is not always something people choose to do in fear
of someone else progressing above them. In
a situation like this it could also be seen as a person who is deflecting instead of
cooperating, I have also been looking at the concept of game theory and made
some interesting discoveries. Using the
link provided I went online to play a version of prisoner’s dilemma, and used
different strategies to see what the outcome would be. This game works by awarding gold coins to players
depending on what their choices are.
The first time I played the game I played to cooperate for every move,
both my digital opponent and myself finished that round with 18 gold coins
each. The next time, I played to compete
for every move, the results were 14/9 in may favor. So competing meant I was ahead of my
opponent… but it didn’t earn me as many coins as cooperating. Next I tried a mixed strategy and competed on
some rounds and then cooperating, the results were 8/3 in my favor. Once again, not as many coins as when I made
the choice to cooperate. So what does
this mean in relation to my network? What does it mean to me? My professional practice? In an ideal world I would like to say that
from now on I will cooperate in every situation- like in the game, but that
leaves me open to be competed with, to be taken advantage of; would I ever win
any gold coins?… This is a massive ethical consideration in my professional
practice, especially in the arts. I
think I need to consider carefully the networks I have, do I cooperate enough? As i mentioned in a previous comment i have already considered the thought that in the past, I haven't. Can I honestly expect to gain from others if I do not cooperate enough with
them? How successful are my current networks? Would we see a difference in the performance
world if suddenly everyone cooperated? Well… There’s a nice thought. Will it ever happen? Within an
individualistic culture I think cooperation is less likely, however, not as
rare as people might think and definitely not impossible.
No comments:
Post a Comment