Task 2c. Reflective Theory.
What is Reflective Practice?
Reflecting on an experience allows a person to arouse their
critical faculties and find deeper meaning and understanding in what happened.
It allows a person to understand why something may or may not have been
successful. Reflection is insightful, and
can be deeply personal and often uncomfortable - we can consider the thoughts
and perspectives of others and take a step back from the situation to gain a
new frame of reference. With reflection, we are unraveling an experience in
order to expose the underlying thoughts and feelings that occurred during and
afterwards. We can then use this
information in a constructive, active way; we may need to make changes to
accomplish certain goals and the desired result.
Over the past few weeks I have been researching and
experiencing the different theories of reflective practice. In my day-to-day life, in the workplace and
at home, I have been thinking through and trying to implement the different
theories into my own reflective practice in the form of reflective writing
using a journal.
The first theories I will discuss are the ideas of John Dewey,
who described reflection as:
“Active, persistent and careful consideration
of any belief or supposed form of knowledge in the light of the grounds that
support it and the further conclusion to which it tends… It includes a
conscious and voluntary effort to establish belief upon a firm basis of
evidence and rationality.” 1
Applying the concept of rational thinking to reflective
practice can have more that one implication.
Giving a more structured and objectionable frame to reflection can be
seen to side step any emotional reactions and purely focus on the facts of the
experience. However, it could also help
to overcome any emotional barriers we put in place. We can also use this idea, first by
acknowledging that certain emotions were present in our reactions, but then
objectionably - and without prejudice - question why. This could enable us to
shed more light on and add further meaning to our reflection. But, I have to ask myself, is it entirely
possible to be completely rational in reflection? I think the answer lies in how much time has
passed and how strong an emotional reaction took place. Emotions such as guilt, fear, and anger are
powerful and can often blind us to the evidence
which Dewey mentions; it is imperative that we are thorough in identifying
these emotions in reflective practice in order to gain a truthful perspective. I believe that a rational take on reflection
is incredibly useful but, at first, difficult to achieve. A more rational and factual take on events
may be easier to accept after the dust has settled and things can been seen
more clearly. Dewey encourages us to
keep thinking until enough evidence is present to support a belief.
Next, I will discuss the ideas presented in reflective
practice by Donald Schon. Schon further
developed the ideas of rational reflective thinking by presenting the theory of
Reflection-in-action and Reflection-on-action. Reflection-in-action
requires the thinker to be reflecting instantaneously upon an event, perhaps
applying changes immediately and thinking on their feet. Whilst this may seem
the most challenging, for a person experienced in the performing arts it can
often appear naturally as part of a creative process. When I am rehearsing for a production,
learning songs and movement etc., I often spend a lot of time before performing
making sure I understand my character, her reasons and emotions and making a detailed
musical analysis of how the song will develop.
Then, on my feet, I am more inclined to change things as I go - it is
not always a conscious thought but something that feels right within the
context of the song. I am also reacting to the other characters around me. This may be a musical choice or an inflection
to change the implied meaning of a phrase.
These are usually unplanned and spontaneous reflections and often they
work better than the original idea.
Performers often rely on their ‘gut’ instinct; Schon introduces the
concept of Tacit Knowledge, which is
further explored by Michael Polanyi, who states:
“I shall reconsider
human knowledge by starting from the fact that we know more than we can tell”2
Tacit knowledge helps us to see that we are often aware of
things that we cannot explain, for example muscle memory. I have often relied on this during
performances: my body and feet know exactly where I am going without a conscious
thought process. This is vital in the
performance world as your mind is free to focus on other things, Reflection-in-action is allowed because
we do not need to fight to remember the “steps”; we can use our more conscious
thoughts to focus on the performance and interpretation. “If you are thinking
about the steps, you will not be thinking about your performance” was a phrase
that was uttered several times during my training. Reflection-in-action
is also paramount in performance when things go wrong. In the world of live theatre things often happen
which cause a performer to change and alter what is happening on stage; whether
it be mechanical failings or a sudden injury, a performer needs to reflect
immediately on the best course of action to maintain the integrity of the
performance. Reflection-on-action can be used afterwards to ascertain if this
was the correct decision or whether the performer could have done something
differently; they can use both types of reflection here to learn something new
from the experience and perhaps make more informed choices were it to happen
again.
Schon says:
“Competent practitioners usually know more
than they can say” 3
Schon is introducing and explaining the ideas of tacit
knowledge and the ‘gut feeling’ that we rely on so much in the creative arts process.
I think it is important to note that Schon himself was a musician, studying the
piano and the clarinet. I do not think
it is a coincidence that this theory could be seen as the most effective and prevalent
theory within performance and the arts. Schon
may have experienced this on many occasions and the idea of tacit knowledge
could also relate to his musicianship.
When I have been documenting events in my journal, I have
found several examples where I have also applied this theory in my current role
in the workplace. When working with a
student one-to-one, several factors present themselves: the current levels of
the student; their targets and aims; and the current curriculum topic they are
studying. In my role there are several
other factors to consider, including any additional needs of the student
including their medical condition. My
day involves planning and implementing lessons, often without the full
background of the student I will be working with. In one lesson I was forced to think on my
feet as the lesson was too easy for the student - I did not have time to
reflect and then present a different lesson, as my only allocated time with
that student was at that moment. I had
to think quickly and alter the lesson as I went. This was successful, but after further reflection-on-action I discovered a
number of ways I could have altered the lesson but I still managed to cover the
lesson objective to a higher level. I
thank my performing arts training for my ability to think on my feet and for
being comfortable with implementing a new idea purely based on the information
received at the time, all the while following that ‘gut instinct’.
Jennifer Moon goes on to further clarify reflective writing
in journals and acknowledges that it is not always a tidy process but in her
books and articles gives hints, prompts, and clear examples of effective
reflective writing.
Jennifer Moon also clarifies what reflective writing should
not be: a list of instructions, or a piece of writing which only seems to
describe events. She clarifies and
encourages the reflective writer to think of the purpose for the journal. Her work and activities often use examples of
different levels of reflective writing which help to clearly define the most
effective techniques when writing in a journal.
In more than one example, the effect of time passing after the event is
presented. We are encouraged to see that
reflecting on an event more than once is incredibly valuable and can open up
the event to many conclusions and responses. In her work, Jennifer Moon provides questions
to be asked in reflective writing to further facilitate a deeper and more analytical
response - questions such as:
“Is there another point of view that you
could explore, are there any alternative interpretations to consider?”
“Do you notice that your feelings about it
have changed over time- or in the course of writing this- suggesting that your
own frame of reference has changed?”
“Are there ethical/moral/wider
social issues that you would want to explore?”4
Within my own reflective writing I feel these questions are
ways to open new doors and delve deeper into an event. They are food for thought and inspire me to
not only reflect on the outcome but on a much wider scale and possibly into
social issues regarding an experience. After
having an experience you may discover other implications on a much wider scale
that you were not previously aware of.
Another suggested exercise from Jennifer Moon is that of dialogue within
journal writing. Examples are given of
an imaginary conversation between two people involved in an experience. This exercise could enable us to reflect on
another person’s involvement and enlighten us on another perspective. However in the example given, the writer is
using this form of reflective writing to make a decision, and is using a person
she thinks will be able to help her the most.
She is, in theory, answering her own questions and coming to her own conclusion,
as the responses she is receiving are imaginary and emerging through her own
subconscious thoughts. This process
enables the writer to see her true feelings on the subject and to question the pros
and cons but from a distance. Using an
imaginary person as a buffer, thus giving the writer the truth behind the reflection,
may sometimes provide a more comfortable experience when making personal
decisions.
Reflection takes many different forms and presents itself
through all these various theories. I
believe it is possible to gain something from each style and apply it in my own
reflective journal. Sometimes I may need to be rational and base my thinking on
the evidence I have from the situation, and other times I may need to think on
my feet, letting my tacit knowledge lead the way. My reflective writing may require structure
and prompts to be truthful and effective. My reflective journal is for use within my
current line of study and work, but after already experiencing the positive
effects, I will be sure to continue writing for future challenges. It is not an
easy process, but an assured way to measure understanding and development.
References and
other reading
1 Dewey, J. 1909. How We Think. Boston: DC Heath
2 Polanyi, M. 1967. The Tacit Dimension , New York:
Anchor Books
3 Schon, D.A., The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New
York: Basic Books.
Gulari, M. A.,
2012 The reflective practitioner by
Donald Schon. [online] Available
fromhttps://graysreadinggroup.wordpress.com/2012/12/18/the-reflective-practitioner-by-donald-schon/
[accessed on 10/11/15]
Moon,J,. 2004. A Handbook of reflective and experiential
learning, London: Routledge Falmer
Smith,M.K.(2003)
‘Michael Polanyi and Tacit Knowledge’
The Encyclopedia of Informal Education ,
http://infed.org/mobi/michael-polanyi-and-tacit-knowledge/ accessed 10/11/15
Moon,J,.1999. Learning Journals: A handbook for academics,
students and professional development, London: Kogan Page Limited